Friday, August 23, 2013

Protecting you Home Business in 5 easy steps.

http://brianmurphy.myhomehq.biz/running-a-home-business
Home Blog Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
image

What Your Homeowner Policy Doesn’t Cover If You Operate a Home Business

Thinking about starting a home-based business? Before you hang a sign outside your front door, check your homeowner policy to find out what is and isn’t covered. The following may not be covered by your homeowner policy:
Business Contents – Property specifically related to the business, such as office equipment or product inventory, may not be covered at all or be subject to policy limits.
Data Recovery – If damage to a computer or other hardware results in lost data, the cost of recovering that data may not be covered.
Offsite Property – Even if your laptop is protected under your homeowner policy, it may only cover it when the loss or damage occurs at home.
General Liability – If Aunt Mabel falls while visiting your home, your homeowner policy will cover her injuries; however, if a client or an employee has the same accident while conducting business, your liability coverage may be void.
Business Interruption – If a fire, flood or other disaster forces you out of your home, making it necessary to suspend business operations, your policy won’t cover your costs during that period of lost revenue.
Let your insurance company know that you are starting a home business, as simply using your home for purposes other than those your insurer is aware of may void your policy. Be sure to note if there are any coverage limits that may cause problems as your business grows.
Refer A Friend
Request A Quote
Policy Review
King & French Insurance Agency
2080-B Fairburn Rd
Douglasville, GA 30135
Designed and Delivered by OutboundEngine, Inc

Monday, February 13, 2012

Car Insurance rates depend on many factors.

The article below appeared in the Atlanta Jornal online today and I thought it could be useful to anone who may be shopping for a new car of for new car insurance. You can also visit our website at http://www.kingandfrench.com/ to receive a free quote.

When shopping for car insurance, it’s not just your driving record that determines your annual premium. The type of car you drive is also a big factor—and some cars are much more expensive to insure than others.

A variety of factors can affect a car’s insurance quote, including the frequency of crashes for that model, the cost of repairs, the cost to insurers when a vehicle is declared a total loss and the cost of bodily injury claims, according to Web site Insure.com.
To give you an idea of what you might pay for a certain car, Insure.com annually produces lists of the 20 most expensive new cars to insure, and the 20 least expensive models.
To generate the 2012 lists, Insure.com used information on average rates provided by Quadrant Information Services. Rates were calculated using data from Allstate, Farmers, GEICO, Nationwide, Progressive and State Farm in ten ZIP codes per state. The rankings are based on coverage for a 2012 model with a “representative” driver (a single, 40-year-old male who commutes 12 miles to work each day); policy limits of $100,000 for injury liability for one person, $300,000 for all injuries and $50,000 for property damage in an accident; and a $500 deductible on collision and comprehensive coverage. The hypothetical driver has good credit and a clean driving record.
The least expensive model to insure, according to the analysis, is a minivan: the Toyota Sienna LE, with an average annual premium of just over $1,100. The list also includes 19 other cars with similar average premiums, all less than $1,200 a year. The least-expensive list tends to include lots of minivans, which have proven to be “safe, economical” vehicles, according to Insure.com.
At the other end of the spectrum is the 2012 Audi R8 Spyder Quattro, a two-seat convertible that is the most costly to insure, with an average annual premium of nearly $3,400. Also on the most expensive list are plenty of Mercedes, Porsches and BMWs.
Did you consider the cost of insurance when you selected your car?

Thursday, February 9, 2012

The need for higher General Liability limits illustrated by this article.

Gwinnett jury returns $2.3 million verdict in slip-and-fall lawsuit against Kroger

By Andria Simmons





The Atlanta Journal-Constitution



5:08 p.m. Thursday, January 26, 2012



A Gwinnett County jury has returned a verdict of $2.3 million in damages in a slip-and-fall lawsuit against Kroger Co. after a judge determined Kroger destroyed and manipulated important video evidence involving an injured customer.



The lawsuit arose out of a May 2008 incident in which Craig Walters, 49, was shopping at a Kroger grocery store on Ridge Road near Douglasville. The lawsuit was filed in Gwinnett County because that's where the company's registered agent is located.



Walters slipped on crushed fruit on the floor near the deli and fell onto his back.



According to Walters' attorney, Lloyd N. Bell, Walters suffered a serious spinal cord injury from the fall, requiring surgery and the placement of multiple rods and screws to stabilize his spinal cord. His medical bills amounted to about $135,000, and he was unable to work, the lawsuit said. Walters previously had been a commercial landscaper.



Initially, lawyers for Kroger claimed the in-store video footage from the time of the accident had been taped over, and that videos are only kept for 17 days unless there is a reason to hold them longer. The store's lawyers also said the cameras did not point in the area where the accident occurred anyway, and provided sample images taken from the camera to prove it.



However, while the manager was giving a deposition at the Douglasville store, lawyers for Walters asked for a demonstration of the store's video surveillance system. The demonstration revealed the camera was centered directly on the spot where Walters fell.



“We couldn’t believe it," Bell said in a written statement. "The camera had obviously caught everything that had happened -- when the fruit fell to the floor, how long it was there, Walters slipping and falling on it -- and they deliberately erased it, lied to us, and gave us a phony sample of video footage to throw us off their trail."



Gwinnett State Court Judge Joseph C. Iannazzone sanctioned the company and issued an order finding Kroger had “spoliated” [destroyed] video evidence. The judge also determined the company was negligent and scheduled a trial on the limited issue of what damages Walters was entitled to receive.



A jury returned the $2.3 million verdict Jan. 20 at the conclusion of a three-day trial.



A representative for Kroger said the company was evaluating whether to file an appeal.



"The safety of our customers is important to Kroger," company spokesman Glynn Jenkins said. "We are sorry that Mr. Walters had an unfortunate experience in one of our stores. However, we disagree with some of the decisions made in the recent trial and are currently evaluating our future course of action."





Find this article at:

http://www.ajc.com/news/gwinnett/gwinnett-jury-returns-2-1318783.html

Print this page Close

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Hello Everyone

We are now on blogger.com. We are here as a resource to help with any of your insurance needs or questions. Find about more about us http://www.kingandfrench.com/ where you can get quotes online now. Contact me, Brian Murphy, with any questions.